RE: Kalam argument under attack
February 9, 2015 at 4:17 pm
(This post was last modified: February 9, 2015 at 4:20 pm by Thumpalumpacus.)
(February 9, 2015 at 2:16 pm)Surgenator Wrote: Oversimplified version: The authors applied a quantum mechanics corrections to general relativity. This ellimanted the Big Bang as a infinitely small point with all the mass and energy in it. It produced a finite size that is infinity old i.e. the universe had no beginning.
How does this comport with observed expansion?
edit: Jesus H Christ, you got there first. This is what I get for sleeping on the job.