RE: William Lane Craig continues to desperately defend the indefensible.
February 10, 2015 at 11:34 pm
(February 10, 2015 at 11:08 pm)Cato Wrote:(February 10, 2015 at 10:14 pm)YGninja Wrote: Do you just misrepresent habitually or intentionally?
"things have a cause, and the only cause for all things is god," I think you'll find, that doesn't even constitute an argument. Atleast try and represent honestly.
"everything which begins to exist has a cause, God is the most likely explanation for the cause of the universe, due to reason X, Y, and Z."
"I'm going to believe in god no matter what you say!"
Like, where did you even get this from? Stop.... lying. Just stop it.
Esquilax fairly represented WLC's arguments. All you have to do is look up WLC on YouTube.
Like WLC you can dismiss challenges with smug indifference, but this in no way refute the argument. "Just stop it" is not an argument.
I've watched WLC's debates and hence i know the OP has grossly misrepresented him. "Just stop it", is not an argument, its a request.
