If

[Little Rik]

Has ever the board of scientists practice intuitional science?
Not that i know, so how the hell can they understand what is outside their competence?

Coming from the guy who has still to tell me what his "intuitional science" says is inside the green box, this is rich beyond the dreams of avarice indeed.

One day you say that you are here because you as a moderator or whatever you are have to go through this shit.
The next day you feel the need to express your thoughts in this thread so to me it seem all a bit confusing what you really want.
Anyway coming back to the magic box i already explained in the past what i think about.
Intuitional science is for expanding our consciousness for the purpose to reach the goal of life which is outside this material-physical dimension.
It is quite possible to expand our mind also with the purpose to be smart and clever in this physical dimension and that is exactly what the fakirs are doing.
I already shown what some people are doing during some Hindus festivals.
They can put a knife through their skin and feel no pain and when the metal is removed the hole close leaving no scars or little scar.
It is also possible to do a lot of other things like to see through and inside a box.
However there is a problem with doing all these things.
If done with the purpose that by believing in God everything is possible then there want be any consequences but if it is done with the purpose to gain something then it will backfire.
You loose what you gain with so much hard work.
It can be a dangerous exercise so it is much better to avoid it that is why people who are serious to reach the goal of life as soon as possible avoid these things like you would avoid to get infected with ebola so to speak.
I don't know what is inside the box and i am not interested into knowing.

---

The intellect is something flexible and open to learning [...] the intellect will be able to carry this new amount of knowledge.

You are the counter example to your own claims.

Please Mister Surgen can you explain to little Rik where the contradiction is?

---

1) Would you say.........oh, well there was no evidence that you existed that is why i never believe that you exist.
2) I was wrong in not looking at all options.
3) I never thought that by refusing to consider that you exist i could not expect that you manifest in my consciousness.

Certainly not #3, because I can't make it scan. After multiple readings, I still find it opaque. So I wouldn't say that, because I try to be lucid.

Not #2, because I haven't done anything wrong.

So #1 is closest. But there'd be no reason to talk that way. If you meet a new person that you've never heard of, maybe Jane Smith from Saratoga, you say something like, "Hello, I'm George, I like soccer, stuffed pork chops, and telling terrible jokes." I have never greeted anyone by saying, "I didn't believe in you because I didn't know you existed."

I know that the standard Christian god doesn't exist, so this god wouldn't be him. She'd be someone else, someone I haven't heard of, someone I'd be curious about. I'd be friendly and inquisitive.

Next to your avatar you say..........gods do not exist ........so you already make up your mind whether it (they) exist or not.
On what bases you make up your mind?
Did you die before and you saw no God-s?
Did anybody tell you so?
Is your so called evidence based on the fact that you never saw God so God must not exist?
You come down with a statement which so far it is not backed with evidence.
If God ever exist then i guess that when you will face him he wan't be very happy to see you.
On the other hand if he doesn't exist then you will be ok but that it is your decision so good luck.