Non-overlapping magesteria

[Anomalocaris]

This term was mentioned in another thread.

Non-overlapping magisteria (NOMA) is the view advocated by Stephen Jay Gould that science and religion each have "a legitimate magisterium, or domain of teaching authority," and these two domains do not overlap
...
"the magisterium of science covers the empirical realm: what the Universe is made of (fact) and why does it work in this way (theory). The magisterium of religion extends over questions of ultimate meaning and moral value. These two magisteria do not overlap, nor do they encompass all inquiry (consider, for example, the magisterium of art and the meaning of beauty)."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-overlap...agisterial

It seems to me that "purpose" and "beauty" are within the magisterium of science too. For example, science can measure psychological wellbeing, productivity, emotional reaction, etc.

Take the example of cooking recipes. Science can measure the quality of recipes in various ways. One recipe might be nutritious. Another recipe might have mass appeal...

That's like saying lying and telling truth belong to "non-overlapping magisteria". The acts may belong in different magisteria of behavior and ethics, but the subjects upon which they act are identical sets.

Science would do nothing if it did not step ever deeper into the so called "magisterium" of religion, and religion would have no followers if it didn't assert nonsense about things in the magisterium of science.