(February 17, 2015 at 12:03 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote: Would Gould then say that any claims made by religions that can be tested empirically are just "metaphorical"? Such as..I dunno...the changing of crackers into flesh or the spontaneous reanimation of 3-days-dead tissue?That's the thing I've noticed about NOMA - it might be a valid view in some cases, but many religious people use it for everything.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 18, 2024, 3:38 am
Thread Rating:
Non-overlapping magesteria
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
An intro to my non-materialist view | Bunburryist | 34 | 8240 |
June 3, 2017 at 9:40 pm Last Post: Amarok |
|
Noma (Non Overlapping Magisteria) | Rhondazvous | 12 | 2365 |
February 13, 2017 at 5:13 pm Last Post: Rhondazvous |
|
Scientific arguments for eating Organic/non-GMO food? | CapnAwesome | 15 | 4566 |
June 10, 2015 at 6:49 pm Last Post: Pyrrho |
Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)