William Lane Craig continues to desperately defend the indefensible.

[robvalue]

For apologists like WLC, all that lot, there's only one question for me. Are they aware how dishonest they are being. Maybe their zealous beliefs really do cause them to be unable to see the flaws in their arguments. I find it a stretch, but it's possible. What do you think? I would say it's more likely that they are well aware of the deceptions of at least most of the "techniques" they use.

These people make me thoroughly sick. I was trying to evaluate how bad they are, and I think the sensible thing to compare to is something like psychics or mediums, other professional liars. I think I would say they are not as bad as mediums, I thoroughly despise what they do. I've seen the damage first hand.