(February 23, 2015 at 1:11 pm)Norman Humann Wrote:(February 23, 2015 at 1:06 pm)Godschild Wrote: He's doing nothing more than he accuses the original story teller of doing, maybe worse. The original story teller was telling a story from a specific belief and pointing to a specific idea.
GC
The difference being that he isn't presenting irrational beliefs as the ultimate truth. It's blatantly obvious you either didn't understand a single word of what was said in the video or didn't watch it at all.
Great work. I've heard the allegories he talked about a million times and when you are a theist, you really don't see any of the apparent problems with them.
I see the problem with his stories, I'm not biased towards them. That is the same thing you're saying, right. I listened with open ears, unlike you would do. I saw the problems in his stories that he was applying to the first story. Unlike you I was able to give a statement without bashing someone. You are arguing from the assumption there's no God, yet you lack the proof of this. To make such an argument, you need to argue from a point and you have none.
GC
God loves those who believe and those who do not and the same goes for me, you have no choice in this matter. That puts the matter of total free will to rest.
