RE: Stories
February 23, 2015 at 4:20 pm
(This post was last modified: February 23, 2015 at 4:22 pm by The Reality Salesman01.)
(February 23, 2015 at 4:06 pm)Godschild Wrote: I see the problem with his stories, I'm not biased towards them. That is the same thing you're saying, right. I listened with open ears, unlike you would do. I saw the problems in his stories that he was applying to the first story. Unlike you I was able to give a statement without bashing someone. You are arguing from the assumption there's no God, yet you lack the proof of this. To make such an argument, you need to argue from a point and you have none.
GC
Arguing from the assumption that there's no God? No. I don't believe in God. I'm arguing with someone who believes in God. I can assume there isn't a buffalo in my refrigerator. I can assume that because I know what a buffalo is and I have an understanding of what could fit in my refrigerator. I can assume that more reasonable objects are not in my refrigerator such as sour kraut because I don't eat it or buy it and therefore I can safely assume there's no sout kraut in my fridge. I don't know anything about gods at all. I can't even begin to tell you why a God isn't in my fridge or anywhere else for that matter. "Assume" does not and cannot accurately describe my attitude toward the word "God". If you believe in God, and you attempt to convince me, I can reject your belief on the basis of your descriptions. I don't have to know or assume anything about gods to do that. Your words are fallible and the logical inconsistencies are enough to prevent me from adding Gods to a list of things that may or may not be in my refridgetator, much less anywhere else. Do you understand?
