Here's A Dilemma

[Clueless Morgan]

Perhaps they can claim diminished sales due to that conservative clerk...?

They would have to hire her, allow her to work there in order to gather the evidence that she, and her hijab, really did diminish sales before they could make that claim.

A demonstration of hardship would have to be made, not merely making the assumption of hardship.

Why would that woman, whose culture and/or religious beliefs seem to value/dictate a certain level of modesty, want to work in a store that sells clothing that, according to her culture and/or religious beliefs, are immodest?

Why do some muslims work at supermarkets where they sell non-hallal meat?
Why do (some of) they, after being hired, then refuse to sell that meat?

That might qualify as a demonstration of hardship incurred by the business and reasonable grounding for firing that employee - but those people were hired and that demonstration of hardship made.

(This also depends on the size of the store, too; if the employee is the only cashire casheere (fuck, how do you spell cashier??? :p) then that business has a stronger hardship case than a business with 10 cashiers and only one that won't sell the hallal meat, or the skinny jeans, or whatever. Both have a hardship case, but the one is much stronger than the other.)

why do you say something like that? got anything against bald women?

---

---

Aww, sad... broken link...