RE: If
March 3, 2015 at 9:34 am
(This post was last modified: March 3, 2015 at 9:39 am by Little Rik.)
(March 2, 2015 at 1:08 pm)IATIA Wrote:(March 1, 2015 at 8:06 am)Riketto Wrote: ... And of course we can not see the mind because it is something NON physical.We all have a mind and can discuss what it might be. The presence of the mind is evident and valid.
So does this means that God is not there just because your physical senses can not grasp his presence?
I am afraid that you don't follow the thread of the conversation.
I never said that the mind does not exist.
The thread was that if the mind exist although it can not be perceive physically it is also possible that God being a non physical entity can exist as he also is a non perceivable entity physically speaking.
This was in answer to people who said that God doesn't exist on the bases that is not anywhere to be seen or perceived physically speaking.
Do you follow?
(March 3, 2015 at 9:34 am)Stimbo Wrote:(March 3, 2015 at 9:22 am)Riketto Wrote: In the meantime my practice into the intuitional field tell that the pineal gland is the seat of consciousness and the mind is a reflexion of the consciousness.
Yet your intuitional field won't (or can't) tell you what's in the green box. You haven't even tried to guess - not even once - which would fall smack in the centre of what intuition means. What good is all this stuff if you never test it; or more likely, only ever test it to confirm what you already believe to be true?
(Deflection, obfuscation and ad hominems in 3... 2... 1...)
Stim, i am not sure what the rules of the forum say about keeping on asking the same thing when i already reply to your question at least 3 times.
As an administrator you should know whether you brake the rules or not.
I just leave it to you.
Have a lovely day.