(March 7, 2015 at 4:06 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: Say we were both homicide detectives and we were investigating a stabbing.
You would need to see the suspect on top of the victim in the act of stabbing in order to consider the evidence, while all I require is a fingerprint at the scene.
![[Image: 200w.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=media1.giphy.com%2Fmedia%2FcRq8TJsIKmQRG%2F200w.gif)
That is the single worst analogy I have ever heard. Beats even the stealing kid one.
A much better one would be: we're rational people and you're just going "aliens!!" at everything you can't explain.
Oh wait.