(March 8, 2015 at 8:02 am)Brian37 Wrote: Buying JFK crap is as bad as claiming Bush or Jews planted explosives in the towers. Oswald was a disturbed individual and the only thing the government did wrong was not have good security in place and allowed Oswald to fall through the cracks, the same way we knew Bin Ladin was a threat under both Clinton and Bush. There was no conspiracy, there were simply bad conditions. If you want to believe something badly enough you will. No different a conspiracy than what leads humans to believe gods exist.
No, it's not the same.
One thing is possible, since you only need a hand full of guys to pull a hit. The other thing is totally impossible, since thousands of people and organisations had to be involved to pull something of that magnitude.
As for me, I'm open to any serious discussion about the Kennedy hit. And by serious I don't mean what conspiracy nuts forked out in the last 50 years, such as Jim Garrison, who showed his cabalistic acrobatics with phone numbers, thereby becoming a laughing stock. I'm rather interested in what historians and shooting experts make of the Zabruda footage. Yeah, probably Oswald acted alone, but that doesn't mean it weren't interesting what our technology can make of the grainy pictures of 1963 and the conclusions being drawn. So far I'm going with Oswald, since there is no real evidence pointing in a different direction. But if at some point new evidence came up, I wouldn't be surprised. Which is certainly not the case with 9/11.
As I said before, size matters very much.