(March 8, 2015 at 4:48 pm)Brian37 Wrote:(March 8, 2015 at 4:17 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote: I certainly agree that Oswald was cracked in the head.
The fact is, two different government panels arrived at two different conclusions about JFK's murder. Citing only one of them as authoritative doesn't seem to make much sense, especially considering some of the practices concerning evidence and questioning the WC had in place.
Occham's razor. You are stupidly insisting the government would not want people to know the truth.
No, I am not. I do not "know" who killed JFK. I have my own opinions, and that is all they are, and as such I'm not trying to push them on you or anyone else; I'm merely trying to explain my skepticism.
You, on the other hand, are making assumptions about my mindset, when you have no basis for so doing. I've not once appealed to information that isn't public, and I've not once insinuated that the government is an active participant in a cover-up. I've only stated that I believe the assassination involved more than LHO.
By the way, Occam's Razor is a well-advised principle to getting at the truth of a matter, but it is not a rule of logic. I accept its premise as valid and very useful, but at the same time understand that it is sometimes violated by events or phenomena.
(March 8, 2015 at 3:51 pm)Brian37 Wrote: 50 years have passed, there is no need this far after the fact to hold anything back. Otherwise maybe someone paid Hinkley to whack Reagan and the government covered it up.
Keep making spurious comparisons. You're really not helping your point, but hey, that's not my problem. I don't know what the government has locked away, and I'm not speculating about it; I'm limiting my points here to what is on record.
