If

[Little Rik]

Any particular reason why you twist my words?

Do you feel I was misrepresenting you? You claimed that the top always giving birth to the bottom was the way nature worked. Yet you also claimed that you believe the Darwinian theory of evolution. This seemed to be in conflict. If you feel something has been made crooked, then straighten it.

I thought that as a yogini you would have a little bit of knowledge about how the system according yoga works.
Let me explain considering that you are a fake yogini and then we come to Mr. Darwin.
In yoga God turn his consciousness into something less pure and perfect in order to create the universe with so many things inside.
Step by step he create the 5 fundamental factors (space, air, light, water and matter) so even the matter is part of of consciousness and therefore it has all the qualifications to be part of God but at the same time this consciousness is in a latent or dormant stage.
Here so far we have seen a DE-evolution as the pure consciousness is turned into a latent or dormant consciousness unable to be aware of his real status or aware of realizing who really is.
The latent or dormant stage however doesn't last for ever and here we enter in the stage of evolution.
So De-evolution is the stage in which the pure consciousness loose his purity or his perfect equilibrium and become crude or almost devoid of consciousness and EVOLUTION is the stage in which slowly slowly it regain his full consciousness.
From matter to vegetable life to animal life to human life and back to God consciousness.
Suppose you think about something.
After a while or sometime you stop thinking about that particular thing and regain your normal mental status.
A human does this in a smaller scale but God being God does in a bigger scale creating the universe in this manner.
When Mr. Darwin observe the evolution of animals into something more evolved he only understand that small evolution is turned into big evolution so from here you may wrongly think that the small create the big but in reality it happen that the small is turned into big because the process of devolution give way to the process of evolution in order to regain his original status.
Evolution can not go without a previous process of devolution so what really happen is that the big is turned into small and this small is again turned into big so it is always the big that create the small not the other way around.
Darwin only look at one side of the coin.
Nothing wrong with his analysis that is why i said that he notice evolution by observing animals and other things but again his analysis is confined to the process of evolution and nothing else.
Capish?