RE: Square-circles Vs. God
March 12, 2015 at 4:36 pm
(This post was last modified: March 12, 2015 at 4:58 pm by The Reality Salesman01.)
(March 12, 2015 at 1:04 pm)rasetsu Wrote: I don't see why God couldn't be superomnipotent, yet these laws of logic are something he created. If he created the other laws, then why not the laws of logic?I suppose he could. Honestly, that's the only way I think it could make sense. If any God were real, then it would be of that kind. Though, any God of that kind would not be contingent upon those laws and as a result, could not be defined by them and therefore could neither be conceived of as anything except "that which exists beyond them" .So, when we say things are "logically impossible" that would be an accurate assessment from our standpoint. Things like "square circles" would just be examples of a fork in the road where our capacity for understanding splits from Gods. And if all of this were true, it would mean that we lack the cognitive faculties for even pretending to know what God is beyond this current speculation that-God is that which lies beyond the human comprehension of what can be real. This would certainly justify the assumption that anyone who claims to have any knowledge of God is a liar.
Wait a minute...
I just used logic in an attempt to affirm that illogicality is synonymous with God. And since illogical conclusions do not have properties themselves, they certainly can't be affirmative proofs of anything logical. This whole thing is a mess...I need a beer.
