RE: If
March 18, 2015 at 4:46 am
(This post was last modified: March 18, 2015 at 5:22 am by Little Rik.)
(March 17, 2015 at 6:46 pm)Stimbo Wrote:(March 17, 2015 at 1:22 pm)The Reality Salesman Wrote: I'm not trying to pick at nits here, but you should really use the article "a" when referring to a noun that doesn't begin with a vowel sound. I'm sorry, but each time I read "An hypothetical..." It's as if someone is scratching their nails on a chalkboard.
Unfortunately it is grammatically accurate. I use it myself when not writing informally.
Stim, you are heaven sent.
I have been waiting for days and days on end to see you down here in this low caste forum.
Thanks again for coming.
Now i have to beg your pardon but i have a big big problem.
I am sure you can help.
You remember when i was kicked out the philosophy forum?
Well first of all let me say that it was the correct decision as it is and was obvious that my knowledge of philosophy is next to zero.
Now the problem is this.....i have been dreaming day and night that MAYBE one day i may post again in such a forum but first i have to learn many many things about philosophy and here is where i really need your help.
I would like to know WHAT IS THE MEANING OF PHILOSOPHY AND WHO QUALIFY TO BE A REAL PHILOSOPHER.
Without this ABC of philosophy it wouldn't make any sense to try to understand philosophy.
I also rely on all friend that post on the philosophy forum to help.
You all know these simple question so please help little rik.
(March 17, 2015 at 1:22 pm)The Reality Salesman Wrote: I'm not trying to pick at nits here, but you should really use the article "a" when referring to a noun that doesn't begin with a vowel sound. I'm sorry, but each time I read "An hypothetical..." It's as if someone is scratching their nails on a chalkboard. "A hypothetical God" not "an". If you want to use "an", try this one: "An imaginary God..."; this is not only grammatically correct, but it captures the properties of all gods equally and it will not change the way your proposition is received by this audience, I assure you.
Unfortunately for you even my ex mate Stim point out to you that my writing is accurate.
What i don't find accurate in your post is not to start your writing with mentioning that you refer your analysis to rik so called bad writing.
And here is where i feel like............. someone is scratching their nails on a chalkboard.
(March 17, 2015 at 1:21 pm)rasetsu Wrote:(March 17, 2015 at 9:14 am)Riketto Wrote: Consciousness is like the sun.
Life is like a box of chocolates.
Do you know what happen when you don't take someone thoughts in their full contest but only having a cherry picking?
Simple yogini.
You just make a foul of yourself.
(March 17, 2015 at 1:18 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote:(March 17, 2015 at 9:34 am)Riketto Wrote: Gee, i never thought that i could rely on your great intellect to find a solution to all my problems.
The heaven sent you here Fat.
Can you please help me to understand this important question.
Do you think that if an hypothetical God exist he should manifest in an atheist life considering that most of the atheists are not interested in knowing an hypothetical God?
Would you really show any interest in anyone who is not interested in you?
Please Fat try to help little rik.
I truly, and utterly, don't care.
That is absolutely bizarre Fat.
You sound like a cop that doesn't know why he is wearing his uniform.