What? This isn't hard. You don't treat an orange like a diamond, one is alive the other is not. The fact both contain the atoms does not mean they function the same way. Waves by themselves do not operate at the macro level which is the collective state humans end up in.
There is a few steps between wave and particle and then more to atom to molecule. Making the mental mistake of assuming cognition in human life can exist merely as a wave would be like assuming the gas you pump out of the nozzle suddenly becomes an entire car. You cant skip steps to become the car.
Even with computers, yes you can simulate algorithms to SIMULATE sub atomic activity, but that simulation is not a real entity itself. They have computers that simulate things like hurricanes and tornados, but the program itself is not a living thing.
Otherwise you'd have me believe that there is some cosmic Bill Gates and we are 1s and 0s. It would still as an idea suffer from infinite regress. And also it would make that "programmer" even if you didn't call it a god, an immoral fuck for allowing what we live in.
In QM they do use words like "connected" and "simulated" and "communicate" and "information", but just like theists, si fi wooers jump the gun not understanding that they are twisting what the scientists are saying. Words far to often are taken as a licence to interject some cognition to explain all this. It is the same mental mistake that theists make with words like "law" they stupidly say "lawgiver".
Science is freaky enough without sticking in a cognition in as a requirement OF ANY KIND.
There is a few steps between wave and particle and then more to atom to molecule. Making the mental mistake of assuming cognition in human life can exist merely as a wave would be like assuming the gas you pump out of the nozzle suddenly becomes an entire car. You cant skip steps to become the car.
Even with computers, yes you can simulate algorithms to SIMULATE sub atomic activity, but that simulation is not a real entity itself. They have computers that simulate things like hurricanes and tornados, but the program itself is not a living thing.
Otherwise you'd have me believe that there is some cosmic Bill Gates and we are 1s and 0s. It would still as an idea suffer from infinite regress. And also it would make that "programmer" even if you didn't call it a god, an immoral fuck for allowing what we live in.
In QM they do use words like "connected" and "simulated" and "communicate" and "information", but just like theists, si fi wooers jump the gun not understanding that they are twisting what the scientists are saying. Words far to often are taken as a licence to interject some cognition to explain all this. It is the same mental mistake that theists make with words like "law" they stupidly say "lawgiver".
Science is freaky enough without sticking in a cognition in as a requirement OF ANY KIND.
