It is one thing to notice we are a part of the universe and that the universe is the sum of all its parts. In that sense, yes, we are the universe. The universe could very well be pointless on that account and as mere parts of a whole, there would be no need to contemplate anything of meaning. I'm hesitant to accept that view because what may be true for the whole does not necessarily apply to the parts.
I believe it would be an error to extract from that observation that all parts of the whole must be equally in error to observe and react to flaws since the universe does not seem to notice or care. Would the fish not need to seek places that have more food since the ocean does not care to seek food? Hmm...
I believe it would be an error to extract from that observation that all parts of the whole must be equally in error to observe and react to flaws since the universe does not seem to notice or care. Would the fish not need to seek places that have more food since the ocean does not care to seek food? Hmm...
