Drich, aside from the obvious absurdities of the flood myth that have already been pointed out to you, does it bother you at all that your religion not only sold you a fictional story as truth, but also commited plagiarism in doing so?
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_flood_myths
The above article lists various flood myths that have been circulating the world, many told much before the bible came to existence.
What this shows, is rather not that there has been a huge flood that there is no evidence for that many cultures knew about, but that the flood was a common motif for legends around the world, coincidentally, just like some of the fundamental details about Jesus.
http://listverse.com/2009/04/13/10-chris...ate-jesus/
While I am quite astounded by your ignorant and selective approach to science, I have to wonder: how do you manage to ignore the baffling unoriginality of your holy book?
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_flood_myths
The above article lists various flood myths that have been circulating the world, many told much before the bible came to existence.
What this shows, is rather not that there has been a huge flood that there is no evidence for that many cultures knew about, but that the flood was a common motif for legends around the world, coincidentally, just like some of the fundamental details about Jesus.
http://listverse.com/2009/04/13/10-chris...ate-jesus/
While I am quite astounded by your ignorant and selective approach to science, I have to wonder: how do you manage to ignore the baffling unoriginality of your holy book?
