If

[Surgenator]

It "doesn't make sense" because it doesn't agree with your conclusion. That is where your dishonest lies.

Instead of answering my question you keep on coming up with the same rosary of avoiding to answer the question.
Show me instead where any of mine writing doesn't agree with my conclusion.

Your reading comprehension also needs some work. I never stated that your dishonest statements don't support your delusions. I said you're dishonestly avoiding other statements because they don't fit your delusions.

You believe them to be real because YOU CANNOT UNDERSTAND how the physical world can explain it. It is the definition of ignorance. Your lack of understanding is not evidence for something else.

Garbage.
Nothing to do with understanding or not.
The physical world according to yoga is a metamorphosis of something more complex and big so it is natural that the small which has been created by the big can not possibly understand the big.
It would be like your baby trying to understand what goes on in your mind.

(bold mine) So you believe the physical world cannot understand it because you yoga says it. Can you spell circular reasoning, another logical fallacy.

Adding another claim to explain hide your ignorance is not an explanation. Where is your evidence that the physical world cannot explain non-physical objects? Did you consider the non-physical objects are just an abstraction of the physical objects, i.e. the physical objects create the abstract objects? No? ... But you think abstract objects can cause physical objects, why?

Just explained above.

Yes, you showed how you cannot use basic logic.

The dictionary is your friend. You should use it more often.

Let us take the word cancer that in Latin means crab.
According to some dictionaries it was given this name to this disease because as the dictionary say.................. these words refer to a crab, most likely applied to the disease because the finger-like spreading projections from a cancer called to mind the shape of a crab...............
http://www.cancer.org/cancer/cancerbasic...-is-cancer

Definitions change over time. You still have to use the definitions of words to commute properly, not make up some other meaning for them. Or do you prefer to not communicate your ideas?

I rather believe Sarkar rather than a dictionary.

That is why you are deluded. Unlike Sarkar, the dictionary has no agenda. Its only job is to show what are the current meaning of words are.

And that doesn't make them analogies but models, pigeon.

You start with analogies and comparison and what follow can be improvement so who is the pigeon?

No, you start of with models, and compare the models, evolve the model to make it more accurate, and then build your contraption.

Congratulations, you started to understand one more thing, "you cannot claim something happen because something else didn't happen." Now lets try to apply this concept to your bullshitalogy. If you don't know how the physical world can do something, that doesn't mean a spiritual world is needed. If someone says they don't fell pain when they stick sharp objects in their mouths, that doesn't mean consciousness is outside the brain. etc...

I already answer well above.
The physical world is like your baby compared to you.
It can not possibly understand what's on in your mind.
Metamorphosis can happen for achieving more consciousness or loose the consciousness that you already got.
In this case the universe is a metamorphosis in which (according to yoga) God loose his supreme consciousness into something less and less conscious like space, air, light, water and matter in which God consciousness is in a latent or dormant stage.

Your "answers" are riddled with fallacies. Any simple analysis of them shows how easily they crumble. Yet, you restate the same logically flawed statements thinking this time they will not have so many flaws.

Yes, I'm almost sick of always addressing your lack of understanding basic logic.

Since when you address anything at all?

Several times now. You only need to scroll back through the pages.

All you do is not answering the question or coming up with your usual rosary about the burden of proof.

Pointing out your flawed statements is part of the discussion. When you fix your logical errors, then I'll start answering your questions. Otherwise, I'm not interested on answering your when-did-you-stop-beating-your-wife type questions.

Your false statement, "According to the laws of this universe if you insert a knife into your flesh you are bound to feel pain."
It is false because it doesn't account for the possibility of dead nerve endings or the people are just ignoring the pain. You'll be a moron to claim you cannot kill nerve endings, but I wouldn't be surprise if you do. You'll be a moron to claim people cannot ignore pain because I ignored headaches, knee scrapes, back aches, etc... So your argument is invalid because it ignores there obvious explanations.

So you reckon that all these guys who insert knives into their flesh had dead nerves.
Interesting sur how so many people in that festival had the same symptoms.
So how do explain that few days before this festival their nerves were fully alive?

Well pigeon, do you not understand that you have millions of nerve cells. So nerves cells that died in a local region, doesn't prevent them from growing back or getting killed again. When did I say ALL the nerve cells died?