If

[Surgenator]

Your reading comprehension also needs some work. I never stated that your dishonest statements don't support your delusions. I said you're dishonestly avoiding other statements because they don't fit your delusions.

How would you know that?

From your own statements, or have you been lying all this time.

So you believe the physical world cannot understand it because you yoga says it. Can you spell circular reasoning, another logical fallacy.

Not at all sur.
I believe that the physical world can not understand the spiritual world because the spiritual world created the physical in the first place.

You forgot to add "because yoga says so."

Definitions change over time. You still have to use the definitions of words to commute properly, not make up some other meaning for them. Or do you prefer to not communicate your ideas?

I am glad that you say that..........Definitions change over time.
It is a big change compared to your old dogma that definitions are sort of true things because they come from a dictionary.
But again you are still stuck in the dogma when you say that we should not change them (if needed).

Your avoidance of using current or even older definitions shows you don't know how to communicate your ideas.

That is why you are deluded. Unlike Sarkar, the dictionary has no agenda. Its only job is to show what are the current meaning of words are.

Garbage.
Those who created or change the meaning of the words had an agenda.

Society decides what the definitions are. The dictionary only writes them down. If you want to go against society, then there is a white padded room waiting for you.

No, you start of with models, and compare the models, evolve the model to make it more accurate, and then build your contraption.

I just can't believe this sur.
Your bla bla bla just agree with my above thought so what's the point in bla bla bla?

Analogies are not models. A model is much more refined.

Your "answers" are riddled with fallacies. Any simple analysis of them shows how easily they crumble. Yet, you restate the same logically flawed statements thinking this time they will not have so many flaws.

Not at all sur.
If my statement is a fallacy than you should show that it is by telling me that the baby can understand what is inside his father mind.
You don't therefore is you that fail not me.

Your rebuttal is even stupider. I don't agree with your inaccurate analogies, and definitely not the conclusions you reach from them.

Several times now. You only need to scroll back through the pages.

I scroll back i scroll again but i can not see anything that make sense among your posts.

I can respond to your nonsense, but I can't fix your stupidity.

Pointing out your flawed statements is part of the discussion. When you fix your logical errors, then I'll start answering your questions. Otherwise, I'm not interested on answering your when-did-you-stop-beating-your-wife type questions.

Flawed statements?
Actually i usual say...........I BELIEVE IN THAT..........or i say...ACCORDING TO YOGA AND SO ON.

Which make as true as the pink-invisible-robot-hybrid-unicorn.

So you reckon that all these guys who insert knives into their flesh had dead nerves.
Interesting sur how so many people in that festival had the same symptoms.
So how do explain that few days before this festival their nerves were fully alive?

Well pigeon, do you not understand that you have millions of nerve cells. So nerves cells that died in a local region, doesn't prevent them from growing back or getting killed again. When did I say ALL the nerve cells died?

You are getting lost mate.
Let us stick to these guys.
Before and after this festival their nerves were normal.

You cannot prove any of this. You just wish it to be true.