RE: How many strong assumptions do unbelievers need?
March 31, 2015 at 4:27 pm
(March 31, 2015 at 2:50 pm)Surgenator Wrote:
(March 31, 2015 at 2:50 pm)Surgenator Wrote: WHAT!? No that is not what any atheist has to believe or assume.
True, but I interpreted (or misinterpreted

) the question to be asking for assumptions necessary to accept metaphysical naturalism 100%.
(March 31, 2015 at 2:50 pm)Surgenator Wrote: 5a) Is the randomness in QM without purpose?
Answer: purposeful randomness is an oxymoron. Do you understand what these words mean?
Practical answer: WTF!?
My definition of random would be a future event that is
impossible to determine by only measuring the current state of the natural world. If there is something outside the natural world, then these random events might be serving some purpose?