RE: Kudo's to Neil DeGrasse Tyson and Michio Kaku
April 12, 2015 at 5:36 pm
(This post was last modified: April 12, 2015 at 5:42 pm by Polaris.)
(April 12, 2015 at 5:34 pm)SteelCurtain Wrote:(April 12, 2015 at 5:26 pm)Polaris Wrote: Tyson doesn't come off as genuine and the whole story just appeared to be him trying to justify him being the host.So, nothing is your answer. You just don't like him. Got it.
(April 12, 2015 at 5:26 pm)Polaris Wrote: I would rather have someone who speaks at a higher level about the cosmos as Kaku does much more often, than another Bill Nye. Sure people like Bill Nye were great when we were kids, but I expect much more out of a show like Cosmos than what has Tyson provided. Plus, I would like Tyson to spend more time worrying about science than wasting valuable time addressing the people who made him feel butt-hurt about the age of the universe.The whole point of Cosmos wasn't to capture your wonder. It was for the adolescent who might become the next Michio Kaku or Carl Sagan. Hence the cartoons and the lack of in depth science. It was a primetime show, FFS. They aren't going to do an hour on susy or quantum mechanics.
So you agree with Cosmos being dumbed down from its original version?
But if we walk in the light, as He is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus, His Son, purifies us from all sin.
