(April 12, 2015 at 12:38 pm)robvalue Wrote: If the question I'm being asked necessarily involves an unknowable element, then I don't feel justified saying I know it is false unless it contains logical inconsistencies. Even if I discard solipsism, I'm still left with unknowable elements.
It's not an unknowable element, it's an unknown element. There's no reason to think that there is anything that is inherently beyond human comprehension. There is nothing we can't know. There is lots we don't know at present.
There is nothing demonstrably true that religion can provide mankind that cannot be achieved as well or better through secular means.
Bitch at my blog! Follow me on Twitter! Subscribe to my YouTube channel!
Bitch at my blog! Follow me on Twitter! Subscribe to my YouTube channel!
