(April 23, 2015 at 1:10 pm)Pyrrho Wrote:I get that it is optional, I just wasn't sure whether the options are: do both 1. and 2. or neither, or whether I can pick and choose.(April 23, 2015 at 12:08 pm)Alex K Wrote: Ben Davis,
do I have to do both 1.) and 2.) in order to be consistent? In my above sentence, putting them before and after the "and" as in
"has a nice flow to it, and, more importantly, that ..."
looks excessive to me
...
It isn't excessive. However, it is optional, as Ben Davis stated.
Quote:sometimes people put a period and start the next sentence with the word "And."I did that in my first post here because SP told me that it was ok.
Quote:Since it is optional, you are not wrong to leave it off. So you are going to have to do something else to try to convince us that you are not really a native speaker of English. Your grammar and word usage are such that one would guess you to be a well-educated native speaker.Yes, yes, enough with the flattery already

The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition