Debunking of Modern Evolutionary and Cosmological Theories

[Hatshepsut]

This is a 7 page research paper - even 1000 pages would not be adequate for some.

Actually 7 pages is preferable, if they prove the point. 1000 pages won't rescue a thesis that cannot fly.

I think you may find a lot of atheists take it for granted that science is right and so may not be open to understanding the philosophical background...

For that matter, it's common to parrot "science" and "atheism" as a quasi-political opinion without even understanding science or atheism, much less any history or philosophical backgrounds underpinning their development. I've see that on AF, although I've seen it worse elsewhere. I can understand why thinking atheists get tired of endlessly repeating themselves to amuse the blockheads on the religious side, and are tempted to address their interlocutors as "retards." The religion side hardly comes short birds of paradise. But these exchanges are pretty sterile drama.

I feel a part of intellectual honesty is the practice of welcoming those who offer criticisms of your own ideas. Unfortunately, ego prefers sarcasm.

Then again, the OP looks pretty lame to me. (  my ego speaking)

Philosophy can be interesting but to get to the truth scientific methods must be used.

Granted, if you mean "empirical truth." Is this the only kind of truth? Oddly, science relies a great deal on a non-empirical form of truth called "mathematics."