(April 27, 2015 at 8:58 pm)IAOALGIV Wrote:(April 27, 2015 at 8:46 pm)Jericho Wrote: I suppose that is true enough. However, I know that I am not the only one who believes there to be no evidence of a god's existence. So it isn't really as if I am the only one missing something. Evidence to me is anything that can undoubtedly prove the existence of a god. Is it too much to ask for irrefutable evidence? I know I am not the only Agnostic Atheist who would gladly reconsider my stance if a god was to actually show up and prove that he/she was real.
And how would they provide evidence?
That's not my problem. They can present whatever they consider evidence and it will be evaluated.
That's the way it works.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Science is not a subject, but a method.