(April 30, 2015 at 9:27 pm)Godschild Wrote: You're not understanding what I said, try this, God is completely complex, beyond all else. So the eye is a simple thing for God to design, the eye is to complex for evolution to have designed. Unless you are a proponent of macro evolution, if you are you still have a real problem with the eye in that a non thinking anything could design a complete anything.
It's really no more of a "real problem" than understanding how a human being with the potential for thought (note: potential, 'cause apparently some of us don't take advantage of it) can develop from this:
Embryology is a development process that is largely understood, like evolution, thanks to years of study by the brightest minds of those whom arose from a diversity of backgrounds (believe it or not, even some of your fellow Christians are not so fucking ignorant to deny that the eye was designed in stages that require nothing more than an understanding of natural events to be adequately explained). What would embryology have looked like had we followed GC's High Priests of Stupidity? Probably something like this:
"For you created my inmost being; you knit me together in my mother's womb."
Wow. That's enlightening. Please tell us more about your creation "story." (On second thought, please don't).
He who loves God cannot endeavour that God should love him in return - Baruch Spinoza