I find arguments based on the universe's complexity hilarious. It's basically code for "I don't science, but I'm going to try to throw something that sounds sciencey (to my ignorant ears) at the atheist so they go away. Please don't make me think."
I mean, first they'd have to define what their version of complexity means, yet they never do. They just pull it out of their ass as though it has a meaning everyone agrees on.
So, before they even try that weak ass argument, they should at least attempt to describe their metric for determining complexity and how the known universe matches up to it. And if that passes rigor, then they can move on to the next flawed premise.
I mean, first they'd have to define what their version of complexity means, yet they never do. They just pull it out of their ass as though it has a meaning everyone agrees on.
So, before they even try that weak ass argument, they should at least attempt to describe their metric for determining complexity and how the known universe matches up to it. And if that passes rigor, then they can move on to the next flawed premise.
"I was thirsty for everything, but blood wasn't my style" - Live, "Voodoo Lady"