RE: The Historical Reliability of the New Testament
May 30, 2015 at 4:00 pm
(This post was last modified: May 30, 2015 at 4:01 pm by Minimalist.)
We know that idiot jesus freaks try to twist their scrotums into pretzels in efforts to make luke = matty on the Quirinius routine. Fortunately, real historians have already dealt with the issue.
http://infidels.org/library/modern/richa...inius.html
Now, go read your bible....or jerk off. The two activities being similar.
http://infidels.org/library/modern/richa...inius.html
Quote:Quote:Conclusion
Quote:There is no way to rescue the Gospels of Matthew and Luke from contradicting each other on this one point of historical fact. The contradiction is plain and irrefutable, and stands as proof of the fallibility of the Bible, as well as the falsehood of at least one of the two New Testament accounts of the birth of Jesus.
Now, go read your bible....or jerk off. The two activities being similar.