Why be good?

[rexbeccarox]

Actually, my assumption was not that you are malicious, but taking your words at face value when I called you amoral. Perhaps if you read closer you wouldn't draw these inapt conclusions?

Also, how is it you can call someone a "terrible human being" when you reject the precepts of morality?

You've overstated my maliciousness a few times (or maybe I'm misattributing someone else's statements to you).  Maybe you are hung up on my willingness to kill and eat Rhythms family in a post apocalyptic kill or be killed scenario.  I think, behavior wise, I'm fairly in line with most, I just talk/think about it a lot differently.  

As for calling someone a terrible human being, the standard exists.  My interest in letting the standard dictate my behavior doesn't change the existing of the standard.  You guys have your community here, and maybe he's the loveable racist grandma character of the forum.  I dunno why people seem okay with his over-the-top rage and hatefulness.

Somehow, you, a person who admits to not understanding the way societies view and implement morals, a person who admits to not caring about anyone other than the select group of people he chooses to care about (mostly because he's lazy), calling someone a terrible human being has no impact at all.