Historian explains why Jesus ''mythers'' aren't taken seriously by most Historians

[TheMessiah]

But I'm not saying it proves there was a poor Jew, who preached and died a horrible death either.

All the historical Jesus argument really shows is that some people like clutching at straws.

You may not say that - but many ancient historians do; the Crucifixion of Christ most certainly happened - which gets us to deduce he was a trouble maker. That's about all we know:

- Religious preacher

- Died a horrible death

I've already laid out the historical evidence/references so it's really up to people whether they want to accept it or not. The historical argument isn't ''clutching at straws'' - Jesus myther arguments are not taken seriously within historical circles and those arguments put forward, half for decades, been debunked over and over again. I don't know what people expect constitutes as ''evidence'' when they ask what evidence exists for Jesus.