RE: Historian explains why Jesus ''mythers'' aren't taken seriously by most Historians
June 6, 2015 at 10:42 am
A theist could call my neighbor jesus and adjust his bible a little bit and "voila" evidence of a "real" jesus.
The idea of a "son of god" in human form greatly predates the jesus story. It is also likely that the story was a myth that later christians tried to tack on a persona for credence. Thus the story is still a myth, even with a body.
The actually historical evidence for a jesus as described in the bible is nil. The actual historical evidence for a living person tacked on to the myth is weak and circumstantial despite the desperate, and I do mean desperate, bluster from the theist camp.
Jesus was a myth, get over it..
The idea of a "son of god" in human form greatly predates the jesus story. It is also likely that the story was a myth that later christians tried to tack on a persona for credence. Thus the story is still a myth, even with a body.
The actually historical evidence for a jesus as described in the bible is nil. The actual historical evidence for a living person tacked on to the myth is weak and circumstantial despite the desperate, and I do mean desperate, bluster from the theist camp.
Jesus was a myth, get over it..
Find the cure for Fundementia!