Historian explains why Jesus ''mythers'' aren't taken seriously by most Historians

[Brakeman]

To me, the simplest explanation for any piece of writing is always the same. And I can tell you the explanation without even looking at what the writing says.

Of course, I may well come to a more likely scenario once I read it. If I have a good enough reason to do so.

The intent and purpose of the Gospels was to con simpletons into believing that the writers and friends had a special connection to god. They knew that the stupid people wouldn't get an answer from an imaginary being in the sky so they claimed to be different from everyone else. They claimed that they were "beloved" in a special way that no one else could be. only they could talk to god and write his words. Everybody else had to make do with warm fuzzies for prayer answers and guesses for conversations.

Funny how today's christians don't have a problem with inequality. and that they are not as valuable or trustworthy as the ancient goat molesters.