(June 10, 2015 at 11:44 am)FatAndFaithless Wrote:(June 10, 2015 at 11:40 am)SteveII Wrote: But you already said that evolution was fact so you can't possibly think it possible to change your position. Also, if evolution moves from "fact" to false, what might an atheists' position be as to how we got to life as we know it--without changing your worldview on its head. BTW, I did not conflate evolution with atheism, I said it would turn your worldview on its head.
Good christ you're dishonest. I made it painfully clear that science doesn't deal in absolute assertions of truth. I only used the word fact because you were so insistent on its use. It's the best model we currently have that is supported by mountains of evidence. If you want to deem that a "fact" that's your problem. If evidence emerged that disproved evolution then we would stop purporting evolution. How is it that hard to understand you black-hole dense asshat.
And, if you hadn't already gathered on your repeated splatters of shit against the wall, there IS no "atheist position" on anything besides "do you believe in god". There is no atheist science or atheist theories any more than there is muslim algebra or hindu gravity.
I remembered incorrectly, that was someone else who used the word fact. I'm sorry. You atheists all look alike.
Point taken on the use of the word atheist.
My point I was making is that evolution is not evidence against Christianity. It seems, however, crucial that evolution be true to attack Christianity.