(June 12, 2015 at 3:37 pm)Dystopia Wrote:criterion(June 12, 2015 at 3:14 pm)Alex K Wrote: And how do you decide "being black"?
Having significant/noticeable African ancestry? I think it's a fair criteria.
Quote: It's what society decides is black - For the most part, that's people with a majority of African ancestors -That's a bullshit criterion.
Are you ready to enact a fixed rule that only those with a majority of (recent) African ancestors can work for such social justice causes. That criterion would exclude President Obama, for example. Would you have a caucus about who's black enough?
Quote:For mixed race people,That's another bullshit term. Africa is the most genetically diverse place on earth, and there is no such thing as a clear definition of "mixed race.
Quote:they get to decide which side they wish to identify with, but they mostly pick non-white ancestry because, for some reason, we tend to perceive fully caucasian people as whites but anyone with a little of non-white noticeable ancestry is automatically not white.Until it is dilute enough
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition