RE: What IS good, and how do we determine it?
June 18, 2015 at 12:56 pm
(This post was last modified: June 18, 2015 at 12:57 pm by Huggy Bear.)
(June 18, 2015 at 3:25 am)Parkers Tan Wrote: Do you approve of raping 13-year-old boys? Do you think it's more moral than raping 10-year-old boys?
Sorry that my hair-splitter is in the shop for sharpening. You'll need to distinguish the moral differences of the two acts, and you'll need to explain why you regard that difference as meaningful.
This entire "it wasn't pedophilia, raping adolescents is called hebephilia" entirely dodges the point that priests fucking young boys is a betrayal of the morality those priests are charged with exemplifying.
You're retreating to semantics because you know you've already lost the moral battle. Don't think you're fooling anyone here ... but in case you do think that, I will make sure to disabuse you of that notion.
Oh the Irony.
You hypocrites came out of the woodwork to defend a homosexual (Harvey Milk) having sex with an underage teen, I wonder why you guys can't seem to get behind the homosexuals in the Catholic church.....
http://atheistforums.org/thread-26392-po...#pid679293
(May 31, 2014 at 10:59 am)Esquilax Wrote: 16 is the age of consent where I am. Bit shaky, but I don't find this particularly objectionable on its own, and certainly not enough to label the guy a pedophile. Seems like classic theistic stretching beyond their means to me.http://atheistforums.org/thread-26392-po...#pid679295
(May 31, 2014 at 11:06 am)Chas Wrote: Note that Milk recorded his age as 18. It is credible that the boy said he was, and if you look at photographs, he looks all of 18.Gee I wonder what reason Milk would have to lie about age...
He didn't look like a child, so the accusation of pedophilia collapses.
http://atheistforums.org/thread-26392-po...#pid679301
(May 31, 2014 at 11:13 am)Kitan Wrote: A statutory rapist under a superfluous law is one thing. Taking the unreasonable theistic leap of referring to him as a pedophile is something else.http://atheistforums.org/thread-26392-po...#pid679303
(May 31, 2014 at 11:15 am)Chas Wrote: My point was about pedophilia. Go ahead and quote statute, but that says nothing about whether or not Milk was a pedophile.Speaking of semantics... you were saying?
He does not fit the definition.