(October 1, 2010 at 12:29 am)Godschild Wrote: What I put in bold.
OK
Quote:Yahweh is who he was sacrificed to.
Conclusion of the logic prior to it, which was not in bold. Since that part was clear to you, why is the conclusion not clear?
Quote:But he IS Yahweh
John 1:1-14 "The Word was God... and the Word was made flesh and dwelt among us"
John 10:30 "I and my Father are one"
John 10:38 "The Father is in me and I in him"
John 20:28-29 (Thomas calls Jesus "my God" and Jesus confirms this)
Phil 2:6 "Jesus being in the form of God thought it not robbery to be equal with God"
1 Tim 3:16 "God was manifest in the flesh"
Rev 22:13 "I (Jesus) am the Alpha and Omega"
Quote:and so he is sacrificing himself to himself in order to convince himself to forgive us.
I know there's a passage in Paul's letters that testify that without the blood of Jesus, there could be no remission of sin. Do I need to dig that one up for you?
Now is it clear?
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
