(June 18, 2015 at 9:03 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote:(June 18, 2015 at 3:01 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: Parker Tan, I know you don't like what he wrote, but do you really think that kind of treatment was warranted?
He shouldn't have generalized you with the other atheists of this blog, but don't you think you too sometimes generalize Christians with other Christians of this blog?
Firstly, no, I don't generalize to the Christians on this blog. I treat each and every one of you as the individuals that you are.
Secondly, when someone quotes a post of mine, and then lays an accusation of "hypocrisy", then they goddamned well better have the goods on me. He called me a hypocrite, but couldn't cite an instance because I didn't post in the thread he linked.
He laid a false charge. Maybe you're nice and sweet, but I'm not. I make change in the coin tendered. Huggy is a dishonest shithead who isn't worth a pot to piss in or a window to throw it out of, and I give him the treatment he deserves ... and doles out, except that I'm honest. Would you like it if I quoted you, and then linked to a post from someone else to buttress my charge of hypocrisy? No, you wouldn't.
I don't hide my displeasure, especially when it's a cunt like Huggy involved. He wouldn't make a pimple on the ass of an honest man. Trust me on this.
I still don't agree that his post warranted the vile name calling, but that's just MHO.
You've never made any statements like "Christians are hypocrites or had any preconceived notions of what to expect from one, etc? I apologize for assuming. I just figured you had, because the vast majority of us have or do generalize at times.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
-walsh
