RE: What IS good, and how do we determine it?
June 18, 2015 at 11:37 pm
(This post was last modified: June 18, 2015 at 11:38 pm by Huggy Bear.)
(June 18, 2015 at 9:03 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote: Firstly, no, I don't generalize to the Christians on this blog. I treat each and every one of you as the individuals that you are.Incorrect.
Secondly, when someone quotes a post of mine, and then lays an accusation of "hypocrisy", then they goddamned well better have the goods on me. He called me a hypocrite, but couldn't cite an instance because I didn't post in the thread he linked.
He laid a false charge. Maybe you're nice and sweet, but I'm not. I make change in the coin tendered. Huggy is a dishonest shithead who isn't worth a pot to piss in or a window to throw it out of, and I give him the treatment he deserves ... and doles out, except that I'm honest. Would you like it if I quoted you, and then linked to a post from someone else to buttress my charge of hypocrisy? No, you wouldn't.
I don't hide my displeasure, especially when it's a cunt like Huggy involved. He wouldn't make a pimple on the ass of an honest man. Trust me on this.
I'm referring to the atheists on this forum collectively as "hypocrites"
(June 18, 2015 at 12:56 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: You hypocrites came out of the woodwork to defend a homosexual (Harvey Milk) having sex with an underage teen, I wonder why you guys can't seem to get behind the homosexuals in the Catholic church.....The word "hypocrites" and the phrase "you guys", means I wasn't referring to YOU personally.
The reason I brought it up is whenever someone identifies as member of the Catholic church, the first thing "you guys" bring up are the sexual abuses by a small percentage of the priests.... (as if they have anything to do with it) yet the very same people will defend the very same act if you strip away the religious part and leave it at plain homosexuality..
