What IS good, and how do we determine it?

[SteelCurtain]

You are one morally bankrupt asshole, you know that, Randy?

How am I the bankrupt one when I'm simply saying keep your pants on???

Because the message has shown to result in death. When you know people are forgoing condom use because of you message, but not forgoing sex because of your message---which is the worst possible outcome, and you keep supporting this message, you are morally bankrupt. If you are ignoring the results in support of the method, you tacitly support the results.

Catholic missionaries in Africa are teaching abstinence and that people shouldn't use condoms because they'll go to hell, knowing that people are going to follow the easy bit of advice and succumb to natural human desires on the harder point.

These people are teaching a doctrine that cannot hope to be followed, thereby dooming people to die who could otherwise easily be saved. It is abhorrent, and you are abhorrent for boiling it down to "just don't have sex, it's that easy."

Meanwhile millions are dying. Fuck you.

Oh. I see how it is. The Catholic Church is teaching people the truth about the intrinsic evil of contraception ALONG WITH the truth that having sex with people you are not married to is immoral and yet, because people embrace the former while ignoring the later, the Church is a fault?

How twisted is that reasoning?

The message is: Sex AFTER marriage. No contraception. NFP when appropriate.

Hey nutjob: your 'truth' is resulting in the easily preventable deaths of millions! If you support a campaign that results in deaths, then you are a blind psychopath.

If the point is to help these people, telling an entire population not to have sex is more than idiotic. It's genocidal.