RE: Q about arguments for God's existence.
June 20, 2015 at 6:21 pm
(This post was last modified: June 20, 2015 at 6:23 pm by Catholic_Lady.)
(June 20, 2015 at 5:38 pm)Neimenovic Wrote: That's the point though. We're talking about a 'time' before 'time' existed.
We don't know =/= god
Of course not.
But we don't know, still means we don't know.
Meaning someone who doesn't know and has no evidence or proof of how anything happened, shouldn't call me out on my own theory.
We can all be equals here in the sense that we have no proof and choose to believe the path that makes most sense to us. In that, we are all the same. And that's fine.
(June 20, 2015 at 5:53 pm)Iroscato Wrote:(June 20, 2015 at 5:34 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: Haha, thanks for the compliment and apology accepted of course. Are creationists automatically not "fundamentally decent humans?"
I would never tar a group with the same brush in that way - in fact it's one of my core principles not to. Do I always walk that line 100%? No, because I'm as human as the rest of us. It's just the ones I've met and argued with have tested my patience beyond belief.
Good. :-)
Quote:[/quote]Quote:I have read/learned about the big bang in (catholic :-p ) school. As for the origin of the very first "thing" to ever have existed, no, I have never heard anything on that other than it either came from nothing or it always has been.I was leaning more towards multiverse theory....it could be interesting for you to read up on.
I will google it right now, thank you.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
-walsh