What IS good, and how do we determine it?

[Catholic_Lady]

They were perceived as ok by some of the peole of the time and some of the people who wrote the OT. But those people were wrong. Those acts are not moral and they never were.

I apologize. I will take a look.

---

I am sorry I did not get to this earlier. I am not allowed to post links, so here is the copied and pasted from {snip}:

{snip}

Copypasta is just as bad as links. Please discuss using your own words.

Becca, I don't understand. What about this?

• 30/30 Exception
  One very important exception to the the 30/30 requirement is when external links/videos/images are used within discussion or with the intention of discussion. While we would generally advise new members who haven't met the 30/30 stipulations against posting threads with the sole intention of linking to an external site (whether advertising or not) or starting your own discussions based on external content, we do of course allow you to link to external sources when it is warranted. For instance you can post external content if using it as evidence in a discussion or you can post a YouTube video if it is relevant to an ongoing discussion.
  

---

Fair enough. I looked it up. This is what I found:

"Descriptive moral relativism holds only that some people do in fact disagree about what is moral; meta-ethical moral relativism holds that in such disagreements, nobody is objectively right or wrong; and normative moral relativism holds that because nobody is right or wrong, we ought to tolerate the behavior of others even when we disagree about the morality of it."


None of this is in  line with my Catholic views.

---

According to some isolated phrases in the OT.

If you look at the entirety of the bible, particularly the teachings of Jesus, you will see that absolutely, killing children is wrong.

So God was wrong for killing his son to save you from your sins?

God didn't kill Jesus. Other people did.