(June 21, 2015 at 12:29 am)Catholic_Lady Wrote: Just to clarify what you're saying here, since that society considers these acts moral, is it then, moral?To them, in their society, yes it is. Do I consider it moral? No. Do I expect the society I live in to condone it? No. Can you prove that your morality is right and theirs is wrong? No.
(June 21, 2015 at 12:29 am)Catholic_Lady Wrote:(June 21, 2015 at 12:18 am)SnakeOilWarrior Wrote: Objective morality would give no room whatsoever for jeebus to do this. Objective morality is unchanging and unchangeable. It is a dictate from outside.
I'm not sure what you mean by this. Are you saying that Jesus should not have stopped the stoning of the adulteress?
No, I'm saying that if morality were objective, he could not have stopped the stoning of the adulteress. If the morality you hold near and dear is indeed objective, it is what it is, no matter what and cannot be changed and the morality he lived by called for her to be stoned.
Thief and assassin for hire. Member in good standing of the Rogues Guild.
