RE: What IS good, and how do we determine it?
June 22, 2015 at 2:59 am
(This post was last modified: June 22, 2015 at 3:00 am by Catholic_Lady.)
(June 22, 2015 at 2:53 am)robvalue Wrote: OK, thanks CL
You certainly seem to be appreciative of our perspective which is a rarity here.
You have been nothing but extremely kind to me. Definitely one of my favorites around here!
(June 22, 2015 at 2:09 am)robvalue Wrote: CL: this will be my last ride round the merry go round, and feel free to not answer any of my questions. This is curiosity, not an interrogationI shall leave you in peace whether or not you answer these.
So... what does it matter if something is "inherently wrong"? What is the point of this phrase? Who is it inherently wrong to? Clearly not to us as humans, as we take the situation into account before deciding how wrong it was. If God thinks it's inherently wrong but even he makes allowances, what is left? What does it matter if it's inherently wrong, why not call it inherently cheesecake? At best you can say it's probably wrong before considering mitigating factors. Would you agree?
Objective means it applies to everyone and everything and is not dependent on anyone's opinions or perspective. A commandment about morality from God is therefor not objective. You seem to be wanting to make god's opinion objective. But he can have whatever opinion he wants, right? Or is his opinion ultimately bound by something else?
As for Jesus, it appears that because he said, "Treat others as you want to be treated" that we can just assume he meant whatever we like about other subjects whether he says so or not. That is quite clearly projecting your own morality onto the bible, not the other way round. Now don't get me wrong, that is great! I'll take your morality over the bible any day of the week.
Can I answer this in the morning? Long question! I don't want you to think I am dismissing you.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
-walsh
