(June 23, 2015 at 1:19 am)rexbeccarox Wrote:(June 23, 2015 at 1:04 am)Catholic_Lady Wrote: "There is no theft if consent can be presumed or if refusal is contrary to reason and the universal destination of goods."
With that being said, I was incorrect in failing to make this distinction on my response to your post. I stand corrected, and I apologize.
With every post you make in this thread, you're proving you don't actually believe in objective morality.
I don't think it's conducive to a good discussion to tell other people what they really believe. Just MHO.
I know Randy has done this and yall get really upset about it, so I think you can understand where I am coming from.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
-walsh
