Historian explains why Jesus ''mythers'' aren't taken seriously by most Historians

[Mudhammam]

It sounds like you'd rather, quite shamelessly, make excuses for your ignorance of historiography and the materials available to historians rather than acknowledge how pathetically hilarious your previous arguments were. But as you said, you just don't care to make informed arguments. Pretty typical of your clan, which is the actual reason nobody takes your position very seriously while the religious fundamentalists on the other side of your coin justifiably criticize the dogmas of such pseudo-skepticism. Thanks for the exemplary demonstration of that in a nut shell.