(October 3, 2010 at 4:55 am)fr0d0 Wrote: No, the historicity isn't the focus of the religion, but you can't seem to get that. Yeah there's loads to talk about on the subject, and I told you it doesn't interest me. Funny you shy away from talking to people who actually are.
I haven't shied away from talking to people about it at all, you continually make shit up, are you a pathological liar?
I find it amusing that although you believe that god was incarnate on earth 2000 years ago and said some really important things, you seem to have no interest in uncovering what he actually said. I must then ask, what is the value of these words to you anyway? Or maybe you just don't care cause God's all up in your head telling you how it all works?
All you seem to want to do is satisfy what you already believe, and in the process you throw away everything that could possibly contest your views as "ignorance".
Quote:My assertion isn't bare because having entertained your bullying I addressed a point and found it to be so. I know and listen to many people who spend their lives studying the historicity and am quite confident in the validity of it.
Confident in people who think that the bible is historically accurate? They don't really exist buddy, not in the real of professional historians. Maybe you want to go read a rebuttal to your Lee Strobel 'historical bible' bullshit.
Quote:I
Now if your not interested in a discussion, please go away.
Not interested in discussion? That must be why I'm challenging all of your bullshit huh? because i don't want a discussion *rolls eyes*
.
