(June 26, 2015 at 1:10 am)Catholic_Lady Wrote:(June 26, 2015 at 12:10 am)SnakeOilWarrior Wrote: You defended his point over and over acting as if it made all the sense in the world. My point is really quite simple. If gawd didn't condone rape, he should have set up the rules before their morality got so poor. Your gawd is all knowing, yeah?
I defended his point simply to show he neither condones rape, nor thinks God condones rape. That seemed very clear to me, but people were still accusing him of it for some reason, so I figured I'd clarify. It's not my argument, it's not what I think happened, so I have no answer for your question. Ask Randy.
Well for me if he believes the stories in the old testament are true and takes the position that if god was ordering it than it wasn't really rape, then in my eyes he is condoning rape. He is trying to get around condoning rape by pretending that kidnapping a woman, forcing her to marry you and having sex with her, is not rape.
