RE: Historian explains why Jesus ''mythers'' aren't taken seriously by most Historians
June 27, 2015 at 4:21 am
(June 27, 2015 at 3:47 am)abaris Wrote:(June 27, 2015 at 2:32 am)Chas Wrote: If one dismisses the magical claims, then in what way is the existence of a shabby, itinerant preacher in any way important?
If you take the shabby, itinerant preacher out of the equation, the whole house of cards is coming down. There's virtually nothing left after that.
But without the magic claims, there is already nothing left.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Science is not a subject, but a method.